- Advertisement -

As Evergrande default looms, what legal options do offshore creditors have?


LONDON/HONG KONG, Oct 13 (Reuters) – With China Evergrande Group’s (3333.HK) default deadline drawing nearer, offshore bond buyers within the property developer are pondering their legal options to safeguard their investments.

Below are some components at play as offshore buyers, with some $20 billion of Evergrande debt excellent, gear as much as take care of the potential fallout from what might turn out to be China’s largest ever company default:


Chinese legal guidelines stop mainland-incorporated guardian corporations from guaranteeing their subsidiaries’ offshore debt with out going via a registration and approval course of.

To work round this, offshore company bonds, in lots of circumstances, are issued by Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) and have a so-called keepwell construction.

The method many market contributors labored across the lack of a assure was through the use of keepwell deeds – an enterprise to bondholders, and the offshore SPV which points the debt, that the guardian will be sure the SPV maintains a optimistic web value and stays solvent.

The keepwell construction emerged in 2012-2013, in response to Fitch, which cited knowledge estimating that in 2020 greater than 16%, or almost $100 billion, of excellent offshore bonds issued by Chinese corporates contained keepwell buildings.


Chinese courts are extensively seen to have broad discretion to refuse to implement a keepwell, based mostly on public curiosity.

“The fundamental question in front of investors is whether the keepwell agreement is enforceable and what difference that may make in the recovery process should the group default,” stated Matthew Chow at S&P Global Ratings.

Test circumstances for this construction have been few and much between.

Chow factors to the case of Peking University Founder Group Co Ltd, the place court-appointed directors dominated final 12 months that they’d not recognise the keepwell deeds of the group’s defaulted offshore bonds.

But in a separate case, an offshore bondholder in CEFC Shanghai International Group Limited (CEFC), who filed a declare in Hong Kong towards the corporate for breach of the keepwell deed, secured a default judgment in its favour.

This determination was upheld final November on the grounds that enforcement wouldn’t be contrary to public interest, legislation agency Ashurst says. But it notes {that a} determination might have been completely different if proceedings had been contested.


Given how entrenched Evergrande is in China’s financial system, some analysts voiced doubts over how enthusiastic Chinese courts could be to facilitate a payout to overseas creditors, probably to the detriment of home ones.

David Billington, a restructuring accomplice at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, stated creditors might need another options.

“Instead of enforcing the keepwell itself, the bondholders could put the offshore issuer company into liquidation or other insolvency process,” Billington stated.

This would basically imply the creditors take over the SPV that issued the bonds via a liquidator, who then would pursue the car’s claims towards the Chinese guardian firm.

Such a transfer might enhance the optics for the Chinese courtroom, Billington stated.

“Instead of giving a judgment requiring a payment directly to a bunch of foreign creditors, the Chinese court would just be upholding a promise that a mainland parent gave to its subsidiary, which it failed to perform on.”

However, the character of the issuers and the invisible hand of authorities can show a stumbling block, stated Karl Clowry, restructuring accomplice at Addleshaw Goddard in London.

“Evergrande is almost like a quasi-sovereign debt restructuring in that the significant stakeholders and the authorities are no doubt dictating what should be done, although with the sponsor still in place,” he stated.

“The hand of the government and authorities is never far away.”


Chinese restructurings are sometimes sophisticated and never simply standardised, in response to S&P. However, in terms of dollar-bond defaults, out-of-court restructurings are widespread and permit creditors some leeway to strike a deal completely different to the one agreed with home creditors and on completely different timelines.

Tewoo Group accomplished an change and tender supply for its 4 U.S.-dollar bonds in December 2019 whereas the agency’s onshore in-court debt restructuring was authorized round a 12 months later.

Even going via an in-court restructuring does not make at all times for snug studying in terms of money restoration charges – which rely on a large number of things from asset high quality to fairness possession and complexity of the group construction.

Based on a overview of almost 50 defaulters going via in-court restructurings, S&P discovered buyers noticed a mean restoration of 23.7%.

“Everyone is watching to see how this plays out,” stated a Hong Kong-based lawyer at a significant western legislation agency. “The result of this could impact the way restructurings are done here in the future.”

Reporting by Karin Strohecker in London and Scott Murdoch in Hong Kong; Additional reporting by Tom Westbrook in Singapore and Kirstin Ridley in London; Editing by Sumeet Chatterjee and Muralikumar Anantharaman

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -