- Advertisement -

Explainer: How Invesco and Indian TV giant Zee got caught in legal row


NEW DELHI, Oct 13 (Reuters) – Indian TV community Zee Entertainment is locked in a legal battle with its high investor Invesco after the U.S. agency, citing company governance considerations, referred to as for the CEO’s removing and a revamp of the corporate’s board.

Zee (ZEE.NS) has stated it has tightened its governance, however the row is unabated simply as certainly one of India’s greatest news and leisure TV teams plans a merger with the native unit of Japan’s Sony Group Corp (6758.T). learn extra

Here is what the dispute is all about:


Invesco’s legal filings reviewed by Reuters – which aren’t public – present it needs modifications at Zee in mild of company governance and monetary irregularities which have plagued the corporate, and have even been flagged by India’s market regulator.

Invesco’s Developing Markets Fund and its OFI Global China Fund LLC collectively personal a close to 18% stake in Zee. They have recommended six new impartial board members to be appointed and the removing of Zee CEO Punit Goenka.

Invesco requested Zee on Sept. 11 to name an “extraordinary general meeting” of shareholders to contemplate its calls for.


Zee on Oct. 1 rejected Invesco’s request to revamp the board. Invesco then took the battle to India’s firms tribunal, the place it’s attempting to power Zee to name the assembly, saying Zee’s behaviour is “oppressive”. A tribunal has ordered Zee to reply earlier than Oct. 22. learn extra

The Indian TV giant says that it has applied corrective plans to handle considerations raised by the market regulator and that it follows the “highest standards of governance”.

It stays unclear which approach the shareholders will vote if a gathering is named, however Zee’s founder Subhash Chandra, father of CEO Goenka, has accused Invesco of plotting a hostile takeover.

“They want to take over the company against Indian laws,” Chandra has stated. Invesco has stated good governance may also help enhance Zee’s enterprise.


While Invesco was pushing for a shareholder assembly, Zee introduced its talks with Sony. The phrases say Goenka will likely be CEO of the merged entity, which will likely be majority owned by Sony.

Invesco has in Indian tribunal hearings stated it isn’t in opposition to the Zee-Sony plan, however its submitting does criticize how the 2 entered into talks.

The Sony deal would enable Chandra’s household to boost their shareholding to as much as 20%, from 4% now, Invesco stated, including that it was “plainly an attempt to distract the general public” and stall the convening of a shareholder meet.


A teary-eyed Chandra made a prime-time TV look on Zee’s Hindi news channel, highlighting Zee’s journey in India.

“I urge Invesco to behave like a shareholder not like the owner … You want a fight, then I will fight back,” he stated.

Zee, which has for years provided dozens of leisure channels and reveals in many native languages in India, is a family identify. It is now discovering help from Bollywood.

“Zee which was first Indian channel promoted by Indian nationalist … (is) now hounded by American and Chinese investors. Pray Zee Entertainment remains in original Indian entrepreneur’s passionate hands,” movie producer Boney Kapoor stated on Twitter.


Invesco, in response to Zee, tried in February to forge a take care of components of an Indian group in a transfer that may have allowed Goenka to go the brand new firm and raised his household’s stake in the merged agency. Zee didn’t identify the group. learn extra

That deal didn’t undergo, nonetheless, as Zee didn’t imagine it was in shareholders’ curiosity.

In response, Invesco accepted that it did facilitate talks, which it stated had been between Zee and Reliance (RELI.NS), naming for the primary time the conglomerate managed by billionaire Mukesh Ambani.

Invesco added that it will not search a deal that may dilute long-term shareholder curiosity. learn extra

Reliance didn’t reply to a request for touch upon any talks held with Zee.

Additional reporting by Sankalp Phartiyal; Editing by Alexander Smith

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -