Attorney General Merrick Garland will testify earlier than the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, the place he’s anticipated to face questions about the politicization of the Justice Department.
Garland’s Senate testimony comes lower than per week after he addressed the identical points earlier than the House Judiciary Committee final Thursday and through a time when the company is in the center of a number of high-profile circumstances and controversies.
Republican members of the committee will possible give attention to points associated to Hunter Biden, faculty boards and demanding race concept, whereas Democrats are possible to give attention to the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol.
SEVENTEEN STATES ASK BIDEN, GARLAND TO STOP INTIMIDATING PARENTS INTO SILENCE AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS
CRT and faculty boards
An problem that House Republicans seized on throughout final week’s listening to was Garland’s latest memo to the Justice Department about its staff intervening in incidents of violence or intimidation concentrating on state and native faculty board officers.
Republican lawmakers have criticized Garland for involving the federal authorities in points that they declare needs to be dealt with by state and native legislation enforcement.
Garland has additionally taken warmth for issuing his memo simply days after the National School Boards Association (NSBA) issued a letter asking the Biden administration to use the Patriot Act to take care of incidents of nonviolent disruption of faculty board conferences over points corresponding to crucial race concept and transgender loos.
The letter mentioned some threats in opposition to faculty board members might be akin to “domestic terrorism.”
The NSBA on Friday issued an apology for some of the wording in the letter, writing partly: “On behalf of NSBA, we regret and apologize for the letter.”
BIDEN ADMIN GIVES POST TO NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION CHIEF WHO SIGNED ‘DOMESTIC TERRORISM’ LETTER
The NSBA went on to observe that “there was no justification for some of the language included in the letter.”
The letter has since prompted congressional Republicans to name for the resignation of Garland, who has tried to distance himself from some of the letter’s language.
“The attorney general has been quite clear that the job of the Department of Justice working with state and local law enforcement is to prevent violence, to prevent threats of violence, whether it’s in school boards, whether it’s in hate crimes, whether it’s against election workers, whether it’s directed against judges or members of Congress,” mentioned Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco throughout a latest press conference.
“Our focus is on preventing violence and threats of violence,” she added.
The Department of Education raised eyebrows earlier this week amid revelations that it had appointed Viola Garcia to a federal board overseeing pupil progress. Garcia is president of the NSBA and signed the letter that stoked controversy.
Garland has additionally confronted scrutiny as a result of of his son-in-law, Xan Tanner, who co-founded an training consultancy that pushed CRT-related concepts and offered providers to faculty districts throughout the nation. Garland’s ties to the firm have raised questions about potential conflicts of curiosity associated to legislation enforcement cracking down on faculty board opposition.
During the listening to earlier than the House Judiciary Committee, Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, obtained right into a heated change relating to whether or not Jordan can be permitted to play video of mother and father at college board conferences.
“I’ve also asked for information relating to Chinese nationals linked to the communist Chinese regime that are connected to the Biden family,” mentioned Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, rating member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“One individual, Patrick Ho, was not just linked to the Chinese regime, he was apparently connected to its intelligence services. Hunter Biden reportedly represented him for $1 million.”
During his look earlier than members of the House, Reps. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., and Ken Buck, R-Colo., requested Garland whether or not a particular counsel needs to be appointed to examine Hunter Biden and his funds.
Buck famous how a chunk of Hunter’s paintings was offered for $500,000, which he argued was thanks to familial ties.
Garland mentioned he couldn’t remark, saying there may be an ongoing federal investigation of Hunter Biden.
Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer and Sam Dorman contributed to this report.
Credits : foxnews