- Advertisement -

‘I didn’t do something’: ‘Bridgegate’ scandal’s Kelly on defensive in NJ race

9

- Advertisement -

Bridget Anne Kelly — whose conviction in the “Bridgegate” scandal was overturned by the US Supreme Court — was ripped in a current debate by her Democratic Bergen County clerk race opponent for the politically motivated 2013 George Washington Bridge lane closures.

Two-term incumbent Democrat John Hogan on Tuesday rehashed the monumental incident, charging Kelly’s profession was “not exactly a distinguished” one, and that her public service work was “appointed political jobs,” the Bergen Record reported.

Hogan added that he’s “not sure her past qualifies her” for the submit of county clerk, a task that features recording, submitting and sustaining many public information in addition to helping with administering elections.

Kelly — a former aide to ex-New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie who authored the infamous “time for some traffic problems” e-mail — maintained her innocence in the debacle.

“I didn’t do anything,” Kelly mentioned throughout a debate in Teaneck, hosted by the Bergen County chapter of the NAACP, according to CBS 2. “I can assure you, I had no role in closing or realigning the lanes of the bridge.”

Bergen County Clerk John Hogan said Kelly's political career was "not exactly a distinguished" in reference to the scandal.
Bergen County Clerk John Hogan mentioned Kelly’s political profession was “not exactly a distinguished” in reference to the scandal.
Facebook

“I was convicted, yes, on nine federal charges, and then guess what? My conviction was overturned,” she reportedly added. “I didn’t close the bridge, Mr. Hogan. I did not close the bridge.”

The Republican challenger insisted she was merely a scapegoat for extra highly effective officers, together with one “that even ran for president,” in a reference to Christie’s 2016 Republican presidential main bid, in response to the Bergen Record.

Kelly wrote the notorious e-mail with the topic line “Time for some Traffic Problems in Fort Lee” as a part of a scheme to diverted site visitors from the George Washington Bridge entrance into Fort Lee. The ploy was enacted in order to precise revenge in opposition to Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich, a Democrat, as a result of he didn’t endorse Christie’s re-election bid.

Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie wasn't charged with any wrongdoing in connection to the bridge scandal.
Former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie wasn’t charged with any wrongdoing in connection to the bridge scandal.
REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz/File Photo

Kelly was discovered responsible in 2016 for her half in devising the Fort Lee site visitors jam plan — which decreased site visitors to the bridge from Fort Lee to only one lane, inflicting main backups in for days — together with Christie’s Port Authority executives Bill Baroni and David Wildstein.

Christie was not charged with any wrongdoing.

Kelly stressed in the debate that she didn't have any involvement in closing lanes of the bridge.
Kelly harassed in the controversy that she didn’t have any involvement in closing lanes of the bridge.
Facebook

But in May 2020, the US Supreme Court overturned the federal convictions in opposition to Kelly and Baroni.

Her involvement in the Fort Lee incident turning into a marketing campaign situation isn’t a shock to Kelly. She informed The Post in January that she anticipated it to return up and that wouldn’t draw back from instantly addressing the matter.

“It’s not something I’m afraid to talk about,” Kelly mentioned beforehand. “I testified for four or five days in a federal trial. I wasn’t afraid of the US Attorney’s Office. I’m not afraid of this.”

In addition, her rival, Hogan, Hogan informed an area outlet that her e-mail disqualified her from future public service.

She’s already had a chance at public service and I don’t assume she needs to be rebuilding her life on the general public dime,” Hogan told NorthJersey.com. “You can’t take that e-mail away. Maybe the Supreme Court determined that she didn’t break any legal guidelines but it surely was actually unethical.

- Advertisement -