MSNBC authorized analyst Barbara McQuade spun the second indictment from Special Counsel John Durham as the lackluster finale of his probe trying into the origins of the Russia investigation, claiming Monday that his work ended “with a whimper.”

Democratic licensed expert Michael Sussmann was charged with mendacity to the FBI concerning not disclosing his ties to the Hillary Clinton promoting and advertising advertising marketing campaign after pushing for an investigation into then-candidate Donald Trump’s ties to Russia in 2016, considerably over a server connection between the Trump Organization and a Russian financial institution.

“Before putting a person through the expense, burden and stigma of criminal charges, a prosecutor should make a determination ‘that the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction.’ This case comes woefully short of that standard,” McQuade wrote in a column on Sunday. 


McQuade argued the case is “weak on the merits,” considerably since Sussmann’s ties to the Clintons have been public data, significantly to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker, to whom he supplied the Alfa Bank tip. 

“So even if Sussmann misrepresented what motivated him to bring the information to the FBI that day, Baker knew that Sussmann was aligned with Clinton,” McQuade wrote. “If the FBI was going to treat information from Clinton’s camp with skepticism, Sussmann had provided all of the information necessary for the FBI to form that suspicion.”

Biden national security adviser faces scrutiny after Durham indictment in Russia probeVideo

The MSNBC contributor later recommended the particular counsel is politically motivated, writing, “It may be that Durham is using this indictment as a vehicle to disseminate what he has found to the public so that Trump and his allies can paint a false equivalence between the conduct of the Trump and Clinton campaigns.”

“Mueller found that the Trump campaign shared polling data with a Russia intelligence officer, met with Russians to obtain dirt on Clinton, and coordinated messaging around the disclosure of stolen email messages. With this indictment, Trump can now say that it was Clinton who brought information to the FBI about links to Russia in the first place and yet again claim the Mueller investigation was a hoax,” McQuade wrote. “Instead of a quest for justice, the indictment appears to be one more shot fired in the information war.

“Attorney General Merrick Garland had the energy to cease this indictment from being filed, and didn’t accomplish that, probably on account of he believed it to be a sound worth — or in all probability on account of he feared that stopping it might create the look that he was exhibiting in furtherance of partisan political pursuits. While defending the independence of the establishment is a noble set off, it could’t come at the expense of an harmless man getting used as a pawn in an unsightly political recreation which will additional erode notion in our establishments.”

“The Mueller Report spells out all the methods by way of which the Russia investigation was not a hoax. The solely hoax is the worth contained on this indictment,” McQuade added.