A Washington Post columnist was savaged by Twitter after downplaying a $3.5 trillion bill Sunday on Brian Stelter’s “Reliable Sources” and claiming the bill wouldn’t price as a result of it was being “paid for.” 

The Democrats agreed Thursday to a framework figuring out how they will get the cash for the bill, which comprises billions in spending for youngster care, the setting, inexperienced vitality and tax initiatives. The $3.5 trillion would be spent over the course of 10 years. 

The WaPo columnist, Catherine Rampell, mentioned her “number one priority” was to dispute what she claimed was a deceptive narrative within the media that inflated the quantity of spending within the bill. 

“There are good ways to spend a huge sum of money,” she mentioned. “The kind of media coverage we have been getting doesn’t really explore whether the kinds of things that are in this bill are meritorious or not … Instead, it’s about the number.”

Stelter then requested, “Why is that 3.5 trillion figure misleading?” 

“Because it doesn’t really represent anything. It’s this weird shorthand that’s been used but, in fact, the bill will not cost $3.5 trillion in the sense that it will be entirely, or at least partly, paid for.”

Rampell’s response invited an avalanche of criticism and mockery. 

“‘Things don’t cost anything because someone else paid for them’ is logic my 9 year old uses about toys she sees on YouTube,” Robert McLaws mentioned. 

Rampell continued, “The actual cost in terms of deficits will be smaller than that. Perhaps, even zero – although I think that is unlikely. And it’s not even fully spending, it’s not right to call it a $3.5 spending bill, because there’s probably about a trillion in tax cuts in there, too. So it’s really hard to boil down the essence of what this legislation is because it does so many things and because they’re still negotiating over the basic parameters.”

“WH floated laughable ‘zero cost’ line & journos are just going with it,” Guy Benson mentioned. 

Stelter interjected, saying, “Yeah, and it will be over 10 years … and isn’t the broader point … they’re trying to do everything at once in one big bill?” 

Rampell responded, “Well, it’s partly what you just mentioned, it’s partly that we don’t have majority rule in the Senate … [so the Democrats] have to cram everything into this one major piece of legislation … They have to do climate, they have to do paid leave, they have to do child care, they have to do green energy tax credits for cars and things like that. They have to put everything into this legislation because they can’t do piecemeal regular-order bills because the Senate doesn’t function like that way anymore.”